The “Homosexual Agenda”: Libby Anne

The “Homosexual Agenda”: Libby Anne

HA note: The following is reprinted with permission from Libby Anne’s blog Love Joy Feminism. It was originally published on Patheos on March 21, 2012.

I was (probably unwisely) perusing the conservative Catholic blogosphere, and it has started to get to me. I’ve read numerous blogs talking about the “homosexual agenda” that is taking over the country and oppressing everyone else. I remember being taught this growing up, to the exact minutia. Reading about it now, though, it makes me angry.

You know what the “homosexual agenda” is? Gay people want to be able to live their lives without threat, hold jobs without fear of being fired for their sexual orientation, and be legally allowed marry people they love. Right now, they can’t do that. The “homosexual agenda” is not about “oppressing” Christians, it’s about letting gay people be full human beings. It’s not about giving gay people more rights than everyone else, it’s about giving them the same rights as anyone else.

I think the reason reading about the evils of the coming “homosexual agenda” has been bothering me is that I have numerous gay friends. They’re great friends who are always ready to help me in a pinch, they have their own dreams and ambitions, and they have crushes and relationships just like anyone else. And so when I hear about the “homosexual agenda” and then think of my friends, I get mad. Mad, because those who speak with fear of the “homosexual agenda” want to deprive my friends of the right to hold a job without fear of being fired for who they are and the right to marry who they love. I feel mad because in some parts of this country my friends might still find their lives under threat, simply because they are sexually and romantically attracted to members of their own sex

I remember believing the whole “homosexual agenda” thing. Back then, I was afraid of gay people. They were different and scary. They were pedophiles who should not be trusted around children. I wonder if that’s how the people writing the blogs I was reading feel when they talk about the “homosexual agenda” – fear of something different, scary, and “unnatural.” But that fear does not excuse the actions anti-gay activists take, actions that seek to deprive my friends of their basic rights and to relegate them to second class citizens.

I was willing to change my views when confronted with actual gay people, and in response to additional information (for example, the fact that gay people are statistically less likely to be pedophiles than are heterosexual people). I rather suspect, though, that the individuals whose blogs I read probably aren’t ready to change their views when confronted with contrary evidence.

When reading predictions of the takeover of the “homosexual agenda,” the common theme seems to boil down to “gay people want to force us to accept them as normal.” Well yes, yes they do. Because they are. But in actuality, the actions gay activists tend to take are directed not so much at personal beliefs as at physical actions that harm them.

Remember when I said that “religious freedom is not a get out of jail free card“? Well that’s what’s going on here too. Your religious freedom is violated if someone forces you to believe that gay marriage is okay or forces your church to perform gay marriages, but it’s not violated if gay people are allowed to get married. Your religious freedom is violated if someone tells you what you have to believe about God’s view of gay people, but it’s not violated if teachers are required to stop students from bullying gay kids and to explain as school employees that being gay is not considered a disorder by the scientific community, or if people are not allowed to fire someone just for being gay just as they are required not to fire someone just for being black. What’s at stake here is people’s actions, actions that do real harm to gay people, not their beliefs. You are free to believe as you like, but if your actions will do actual harm to others, you are not allowed to act as you would like.

Now sure, I’d really like to change people’s beliefs too. I don’t like beliefs that see some people as lesser than others, especially when these beliefs are based not on any evidence but simply on specific interpretations of a stone age text. I seek to oppose misogyny and homophobia both through fighting actual discrimination and through working to change people’s minds. Wanting to change people’s minds, however, is not the same as legislating what people are allowed to think or putting people in jail for their views, though those decrying the “homosexual agenda” don’t seem to realize that.

I’ve decided not to browse the conservative Catholic blogosphere. It’s not good for my blood pressure. But will continue to fight for LGBTQ rights and I will continue to work on countering homophobia by changing people’s minds.

5 thoughts on “The “Homosexual Agenda”: Libby Anne

  1. Abigail May 24, 2013 / 10:55 pm

    Preach. It.


  2. Lois Manning May 26, 2013 / 6:57 am

    Best comment on H.A. I’ve read so far on this subject: Its insightful, well thought out ideas should be taught in ALL schools, public, private and home. These are the humanistic teachings of our beloved Constitution (and Jesus): The Golden Rule. Lets all work for that.


  3. Izzy December 5, 2013 / 11:56 pm

    This post just reminded me that I was once told I shouldn’t watch X-Men or High School Musical because they were part of the homosexual agenda. If you’ll excuse me, I have some DVDs to go rent and a childhood to make up for.


    • Mary Canada December 18, 2013 / 8:40 am

      X-men (the cartoon, comics, and “first class” movies)= totally worth it. High school musical, not so much. “Hairspray”, “Rent”, and “To Wong Foo” were mine ^_^; also a boatload of forbidden anime.


  4. Angry Atheist January 11, 2015 / 9:47 am

    .”Your religious freedom is violated if someone tells you what you have to believe about God’s view of gay people…”

    This is scary in its own way as it defines “religious freedom” somewhat wrongly. As an analogy–I can call you a chair. I can tell you must believe it because God says that being a chair is wrong.

    This does not impinge on your religious freedom. No. You are still free to believe you are not a chair. If a law is made stating: “You must be a chair.” and that is contrary to your belief system, then a breach your religious freedom has occurred. It’s that old fallacy that: “Gay marriage should be illegal because it violates my Constitutional Right to Freedom of Religion.” The Constitution, other than a small section of the 1st Amendment (which, remember, is not an ORIGINAL part of the Constitution) is a secular document dealing with the secular issues of the time. As long as Congress makes no law that creates a National Religion nor creates a law that defines what religious beliefs you must have or can force others to practice, religious freedom is a non-player in the game.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s