The No True Homeschooler Argument: Rebecca Irene Gorman’s Thoughts


Also by Rebecca on HA: “I Was Beaten, But That’s Not My Primary Issue With Homeschooling” and “‘Fake Someone Happy’: A Book Review.” 

“No true Scotsman is an informal fallacy, an ad hoc attempt to retain an unreasoned assertion. When faced with a counterexample to a universal claim (“no Scotsman would do such a thing”), rather than denying the counterexample or rejecting the original universal claim, this fallacy modifies the subject of the assertion to exclude the specific case or others like it by rhetoric, without reference to any specific objective rule (“no true Scotsman would do such a thing”).”

When my mother decided to homeschool us, we became homeschoolers.

We joined the local homeschool support group, my mother bought our textbooks at the state homeschooling convention, and we paid dues to the Homeschool Legal Defense Association. We joined a homeschool choir, homeschool art classes, and homeschool sports team.  We went to homeschool park days and joined in on ‘homeschool day’ at Raging Waters.

To the other homeschoolers it was clear: we were homeschoolers.

The people my parents interacted with in a personal or professional capacity knew that we were homeschooled and asked us the normal homeschooler questions: “But what about socialization?”, “How can a parent teach their children subjects they don’t know?”, etc., and we answered them with the same responses homeschool parents and children publish on the internet today.

We joined the homeschool debate league, for which being legitimately homeschooled (by their definition, legitimate meant: not attending any school) was an enforced requirement. When my mother hosted homeschooler debate conferences, it was unquestionable that we were homeschooled.

When we hosted homeschool game nights, homeschool dances, homeschool ‘Reformation Day’ parties, we were a celebrated part of the homeschool community. When a family friend’s daughter was struggling with school, her parents asked my mother to homeschool her for the rest of the year to get her caught up with her grade.

When my mother was frequently complimented on how ‘good’ her teenagers were, ‘not like teenagers at all but like little adults’, our homeschooling was the accepted cause. When I was admitted to community college and college, my homeschooling was clearly understood as my background. When I ‘graduated’ high school, we rented out a church with four other homeschool graduates, packing out the building and holding an elegant outdoor buffet for the homeschool community on the neighboring school’s lawn after.

For years after, I was accepted as a part of the homeschool graduate community.

I participated in the exclusive ‘Homeschool Alumni’ network. I connected with other adult homeschoolers and compared notes about our childhoods. Nobody questioned the fact that I had been homeschooled. Instead, it was celebrated as the reason for my intelligence, creativity, work ethic, and academic success. Due to my father’s unique position in our local community, there were – and there are – (and this is not an exaggeration) easily more than a thousand people who knew that I was homeschooled, that I played the harp, and that I went to Santa Clara University, followed by Oxford. Many of them knew my face, and possibly even name, as well. I was the homeschooling success story of Saratoga, California, and my family was a model family, one strangers regularly told me I was ‘so lucky’ to be a part of.

But the moment I say that homeschooling enabled my parents to hide abuse and neglect, all of these facts melt away.

I’m no longer a homeschooling poster child.

After all, no true homeschooler would abuse or neglect their child.

I was an aberration. My family was a one-off, virtually non-occurring instance. The families we knew in which the entire community softly murmured about how the children were sexually abused, or neglected, but did not report because ‘it would give a bad reputation to homeschooling’ or ‘the children would be taken away’ also become aberrations the moment I mention them publicly. The number of homeschoolers I personally knew via activities such as homeschool support groups or homeschool debate who were also mistreated, several of which have written for HA, has no reflection on the percentage of homeschool homes where mistreatment occurs. After all, they weren’t true homeschoolers either.

The true homeschoolers were the ones who gave their kids great educations and a great upbringing.

Every account of homeschool experiences should, we all know, contain a disclaimer: ‘not all homeschooling families are like this. Most homeschool families are loving homes that provide their children with an excellent education’. Except, we don’t have any evidence or statistics that this is true. So why is this a required disclaimer? How can we even make this statement at all?

It’s also appropriate to ask: what do the phrases “loving home” and “excellent education” mean to the homeschool leaders and parents who use them? They tell us that true homeschoolers spank their kids, sure, but not to an abusive extent. It’s just to teach them to respect authority. True homeschoolers don’t isolate their kids; they just keep them inside during school hours to avoid calls to CPS, and they protect them from worldly influences. True homeschoolers aren’t educationally neglected; instead, many homeschool girls are raised to succeed at the high calling of being wives and mothers, learning home arts such as cooking, sewing, and cleaning, and taught applied academics as well – for example, how to multiply and divide via cooking lessons, and geometry through sewing.

Start asking specific questions about the ‘happy’ home and ‘good’ education they describe, and an unexpected picture often emerges.

After I had been working with my therapist for three years, she said to me, “You had a truly horrible experience, but I don’t think it is a reflection on homeschooling as a whole. All the other homeschoolers I’ve talked to have had great experiences.” I responded, “Yes, but how many of them were graduated homeschool kids?” Her eyes visibly widened as she replied, “Actually, they were all homeschool parents. That’s a good point. I never thought of that before.”

Homeschool parents: stop crying ‘no true homeschooler.’ If you can’t, an echo of Shakespeare comes to mind: “Methinks thou dost protest too much.”

12 thoughts on “The No True Homeschooler Argument: Rebecca Irene Gorman’s Thoughts

  1. Holly January 6, 2014 / 12:31 pm

    I really love this. I was accused of being no true homeschooler when I shared the “Homeschool Apostates” article on Facebook. Do you mind if I use your line in the future?


    • Rebecca Gorman January 6, 2014 / 12:50 pm

      Please do!


  2. Rose ASL January 6, 2014 / 12:36 pm

    In my mind, the biggest problem is that homeschoolers want to believe they avoid all the pitfalls of public schooling, many of which are merely pitfalls of humanity. They fail to recognize this. They also have come to equate homeschooling with parenting, and it’s not. Home school means just that: a school in the home, generally taught by the same person who is also legally responsible for the children outside of school hours. The only people I refuse to call homeschoolers are the abusers who actually do not make any attempt to educate their children, and they are rare. For them, homeschooling is merely a buzzword they slap on their refusal to send their children to a traditional school. But the fact that you are legitimately homeschooling your children does not make you a decent person or a good parent,


  3. Lana January 6, 2014 / 4:27 pm

    I hate the “not all homeschoolers are like that” Like um, what? We’re all different, but there is no such thing as what makes one real or not real. So people need to get over it.


    • Headless Unicorn Guy January 7, 2014 / 9:33 am

      Homeschooling Can Do No Wrong(TM).

      Therefore, if you do it wrong, you’re not a True Homeschooler.


  4. Heidi Underhill January 7, 2014 / 8:18 am

    Abuse is so common in our culture, home school or not.

    One should not think that abuse does or doesn’t occur in a home because of the type of schooling, the type of religion, being active in the community, or in the income level. Abuse happens every where.


    • aihley January 7, 2014 / 6:52 pm

      How common is it? Is it more or less common in homeschooling families? How do you know?


  5. Vidyut - An Indian homeschooler January 15, 2014 / 8:15 pm

    I live in India and homeschooling has a dubious legal status here. The law does not recognize it and makes some things mandatory that rule out homeschooling, but homeschoolers are not actually persecuted. On the downside there is no real oversight and much as I believe that homeschooling is a great choice for my child, I am also a child rights activist, and it is my greatest worry with homeschooling that it will provide a smokescreen for abuse.

    A child in school has a community that is independent of home, where s/he may seek help if needed, signs of neglect, depression or injury may draw attention of adults not in the control of parents. I have long been of an opinion that some kind of oversight is important and there is a need for homeschooling communities to recognize this and provide a safety net. There is a difference between accountability and regimentation, and it worries me that many parents object to any suggestions of mandatory oversight as though that would destroy their kids.

    That said, at least in India, schools are no guarantee of safety, with occasional cases of abuse including rapes and assaults resulting in death – by teachers, which, at least is something I haven’t heard of – yet – about homeschoolers. Nor will Indian teachers be too bothered about a child showing signs of abuse or even outright asking for help. India simply doesn’t have the interest in child rights that it should.

    Much reform is needed in the interest of children, and it must happen among homeschoolers as well.


  6. adventuresinhs September 4, 2014 / 3:59 pm

    Excellent writing and very well made points. My heart ached.


  7. Sarah May 8, 2015 / 7:55 pm

    My heart breaks for you! I am currently homeschooling 2 girls (7 and 11), and I will not say “no true homeschooler” but I will promise you (as a fellow abuse survivor who was in public school) NOT THIS HOMESCHOOLER!!! I homeschool for academic reasons (my oldest has NVLD and my youngest has severe dyslexia) not religious reasons. I’m so sorry for what you went through! I absolutely believe with all my heart that true respect and love can never be gained out of fear! Love and prayers!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s